Revisiting the Visual Crackle
Moisture in hydraulic fluids
and lubricating oils has a degrading effect on both the lubricant and the machine.
While some additives cling to the water and are removed when the water separates
from the oil (water washing), others are destroyed by water-induced chemical
reactions (oxidation and hydrolysis). Water also promotes oxidation of the oil’s
base stock, increasing the risk of sludge and varnish formation. Water also
causes rust and corrosion of machine surfaces and reduces critical, load-bearing
film strength. Water represents a real risk to equipment and should be aggressively
controlled.
Water coexists with oil
in the dissolved, emulsified or a free state. Free and emulsified water pose
the greatest risk to the machine and the lubricant, and they should be carefully
monitored and controlled.
There are a number of ways
to measure the presence of water in oil. However, most of them are complicated,
expensive or difficult to use in the field because they employ wet chemistry.
One easy way of detecting the presence of free and emulsified water in oil is
with the hot-plate crackle test. This simple, tried-and-true method alerts the
user to the presence of any free water.
For years, oil analysis
laboratories have screened samples with the crackle test, performing more expensive
analysis only when the crackle test is positive. Under carefully controlled
lab conditions, the crackle test is sensitive to around 500 ppm (0.05 percent)
of water-in-oil depending on the type of oil.
In this application, the
crackle test has been used as a reliable indicator of free and emulsified water,
as a “go/no-go” test. However, with practice and keen eyes and ears,
the procedure can be advanced considerably and made more quantitative. Rather
than simply listening for the crackle (scintillation), adding a visual observation
and rating of the number and size of the vapor bubbles produced allows a rough
indication of the amount of moisture present to be obtained.
The revised method is referred
to as the visual crackle. Success in using the procedure depends on practice
with varying moisture concentrations in different common fluids, and maintaining
a constant hot-plate temperature around 320°F (160°C). A laboratory
syringe and a paint shaker can help create a more homogenous suspension, resulting
in more consistent results. While the visual crackle does not replace the need
for other more precise techniques, it does provide vital information when and
where you need it. Simple, inexpensive onsite tests such as this can make a
real difference in the effectiveness of oil analysis and contamination control.
Sidebar:
Method
The crackle test is a simple test to identify the presence of free and emulsified
water suspended in the oil, provided a few simple rules are followed.
|
No
visible or audible change.

No free or emulsified water
|
Very Small Bubbles (0.5 mm) produced and quickly disappear.

0.05 - 0.1% 500-1000 ppm
|
Bubbles approximately
2 mm are produced, gather to center, enlarge to 4mm, and disappear
quickly.

0.1 - 0.2% 1000-2000 ppm
|
Bubbles 2-3 mm are produced growing to 4 mm, process repeats, possible
violent bubbling and audible crackling.

0.2 and more >2000 ppm
|
- Raise the hot plate
temperature to 320°F (160°C). Always use the same temperature.
- Violently agitate oil
sample to achieve homogenous suspension of water in oil.
Using a clean dropper,
place a drop of oil on the hot plate.
Observations
- If no crackling or vapor
bubbles are produced after a few seconds, no free or emulsified water is
present.
- If very small bubbles
(0.5 mm) are produced but disappear quickly, approximately 0.05 to 0.10
percent water is present.
- If bubbles approximately
2 mm are produced, gather to the center of the oil spot, enlarge to about
4 mm, then disappear, approximately 0.1 to 0.2 percent water is present.
- For moisture levels
above 0.2 percent, bubbles may start out about 2 to 3 mm then grow to 4
mm, with the process repeating once or twice. For even higher moisture
levels, violent bubbling and audible crackling may result.
- Be wary of the presence
of dissolved gases, fuel, refrigerants and volatile solvents, which can
cause false positives.
Limitations
Although generally
applicable, the crackle test does have some limitations:
- The method is nonquantitative.
- Hot plate temperatures
above 320°F (160°C) induce rapid scintillation that may be undetectable.
- The method does not
measure the presence of chemically dissolved water.
Safety
Considerations
Exercise extreme caution when performing the crackle test on oils that might
contain hazardous gases or low boiling point volatiles (such as ammonia compressor
oils), which might produce fumes and vapors that present inhalation and/or
serious skin or eye injury upon contact. When evaluating these oils, the hot
plate should remain under a vent
hood that allows the analyst to conduct the test without coming into contact
with fumes or vapors.
- Wear protective eyewear
and long sleeves.
- Perform test in a well-ventilated
area.
Equipment
Required
The crackle test can be performed with a minimum of investment using the following
equipment:
- Hot plate capable of
achieving and maintaining 320°F (160°C) surface temperature.
- Paint shaker (or equivalent)
for oil agitation.
- Oil dropper tube or
lab syringe.
References
1. Fitch, J. (1998). Oil Analysis for Maintenance Professionals. Tulsa OK, Noria
Corp.
2. Komatsu Oil & Wear
Analysis (KOWA). 5th Edition, Procedure Manual.
Further Reading
Barnes, M. (2001, July-August). “Water, the Forgotten Contaminant.”
Practicing Oil Analysis magazine.
Crackle123 crackle123 crackle 123 |